Обсуждение
проблем генетической безопасности, связанных с ГМО и ГМИ
последнее обновление страницы 15.01.2012
Баранов А.С. Агония от ГМ-продуктов может длиться очень долго.
Баранов А.С. К доктрине биологической безопасности // ЭКОС-информ. – 2008. – №4. – С. 27–39.
Баранов А.С. Популяционно-экологические риски при выращивании генетически модифицированных организмов (ГМО) // Современное состояние и пути развития популяционной биологии: Материалы X Всероссийского популяционного семинара (г. Ижевск, 17-22 ноября 2008 г.). – Ижевск: КнигоГрад, 2008. – С. 328–330.
В США впервые признали годным в пищу генно-модифицированное
животное http://medportal.ru/mednovosti/news/2010/09/06/salmon/
Картахенский протокол по биобезопасности http://www.bellona.ru/Casefiles/kartahen
Общенациональная Ассоциация Генетической Безопасности (ОАГБ) http://www.oagb.ru/about.php
Федеральный закон от 5 июля 1996 г. N 86-ФЗ «О государственном регулировании в области генно-инженерной деятельности» (с изменениями от 12 июля 2000 г.)
Экология и жизнь (сайт Ирины Ермаковой) http://www.irina-ermakova.ru/
Энгдаль У.Ф.
Семена разрушения. Тайная подоплека генетических манипуляций. – СПб.: Нестор-История, 2009. – 320 с. – http://lib.rus.ec/b/172939
Яшина Г.А. ГМО: научные факты и политические мифы http://www.kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/192276/
FDA разрешит
есть генно-модифицированную семгу после
дополнительных исследований http://medportal.ru/mednovosti/news/2010/09/21/salmon/
AATF (African Agricultural Technology
Foundation) (2005) The African Agricultural Technology Foundation facilitates
public–private partnerships to serve smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan
Ag BioTech
(2002) Bt corn gene flow in
Agbios (2005). GM
database [online database]. Agbios, Merrickville, Ontario, Canada, http://www.agbios.com/dbase.php?action=ShowForm
Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada (2005). About food
security. Food Security Bureau, Agriculture and
Alvarez-Morales
A (2002). Transgenes in maize landraces in
Amanor-Boadu V,
Amanor-Boadu Y (2002). A
survey of post-marketing surveillance of potential human late health effects of
genetically modified foods’ initiatives: lessons for
American
Soybean Association (2001). ASA study confirms environmental benefits of
biotech soybeans. News Release, 12 November 2001, http://www.soygrowers.com/newsroom/releases/2001%20releases/r111201.htm
Ammann K
(2004). The impact of agricultural biotechnology on
biodiversity, a review. Botanical Garden,
Barraclough SL (2000). Meanings of sustainable
agriculture- some issues for the south. South Centre,
Barry G, Horsch R (1999). Evolving role of the
public and private sector in agricultural biotechnology for developing
countries. In: Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: conference
proceedings, October 1999. Consultative Group on International Agricultural
Research (CGIAR), www.cgiar.org/biotech/rep0100/Barryh.pdf
Barton JH (1999). Intellectual property
protection. In: Biotechnology for developing-country agriculture:
problems and opportunities. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) 2020 Focus 2, October 1999, Brief 7 of 10, http://www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus02.htm
Benbrook CM (2001). Troubled times amid commercial success for Roundup Ready soybeans: glyphosate efficacy is slipping and unstable transgene expression erodes plant defenses and yields.
AgBioTech InfoNet,
Technical Paper No 4, http://www.biotech-info.net/troubledtimes.html
Benbrook CM (2002). The Bt premium price: what does it buy? Benbrook Consulting
Services,
Benbrook CM (2003).
Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the
Bennett R, Buthelezi TJ, Ismael Y, Morse S (2003). Bt cotton, pesticides labour and
health: a case study of small holder farmers in the Makhathini
Flats,
Birner R, Alcaraz
G (2004). Policy dialogues on genetically modified crops in
Brookes G (2002). The
farm level impact of using Bt maize in
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2001a) Ad hoc intergovernmental task force on food derived from
biotechnology. Report of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission,
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2001b). Guidelines
for the production, processing, labelling and
marketing of organically produced foods (GL 32 – 1999, Rev. 1 – 2001). Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization,
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2003a). Report
of the fourth session of the Codex ad hoc Intergovernmental Task Force
on Foods Derived from Biotechnology, Yokohama, Japan 11–14 March 2003; Joint FAO/WHO Foods Standards Programme
Codex Alimentarius Commission Twenty-sixth Session,
Rome, Italy 30 June – 7 July 2003. Alinorm 03/34A. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations/World Health Organization,
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2003b). Principles
for the risk analysis of food derived from modern biotechnology. CAC/GL 44-2003. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization,
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2003c). Guideline
for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA
plants. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health
Organization, Rome, CAC/GL 45-2003, http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/10021/CXG_045e.pdf
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2003d). Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of
foods produced using recombinant-DNA microorganisms. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization, Rome, CAC GL 46-2003, http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/10021/CXG_046e.pdf
CAC (Codex Alimentarius
Commission) (2004). Appendix: general decisions of the Commission. In: Codex Alimentarius Commission procedural manual, 14th edition.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health
Organization,
Carpenter JE, Gianessi LP (2001). Agricultural biotechnology: updated
benefit estimates.
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2000).
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2003). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
from negotiation to implementation. Historical and new
perspectives as the world marks the entry-into-force of the Protocol.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Secretariat of the CBD, CBD News Special Edition, http://www.biodiv.org/doc/publications/bs-brochure-02-en.pdf
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2005a). Official website of the Convention on Biological
Diversity. United Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP), http://www.biodiv.org
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity)
(2005b).Capacity-building [online database]. Biosafety Clearing House. Convention on Biological
Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), http://bch.biodiv.org/capacitybuilding/
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2005c). Biosafety
Clearing House. National laws, regulations and
guidelines. Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP),
http://bch.biodiv.org/
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2005d). Handling of
biotechnology and distribution of its benefits. Article 19 of the
Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). Secretariat of the CBD, http://www.biodiv.org/convention/articles.asp
Chaturvedi S (2001). The public–private debate
in agricultural biotechnology and new trends in the IPR
regime: challenges before developing countries. Research and
Information System for the Non-Aligned and Other Developing Countries (RIS) Discussion Paper. India Habitat Centre, New Delhi, India, http://www.ris.org.in/dp17_pap.pdf
Chen LC (2002). Concluding reflections. WHO conference: Biotechnology and
Genomics for Improvement of Health in Developing Countries, Havana, Cuba, 25–27
March 2002, http://www.humansecuritychs.org/activities/outreach/chen_cuba.pdf
Ching LL (2001). Patents on life patently
undermine food security.
Cohen JI,
Pinstrup-Andersen P (2002). Biotechnology and the public good. Science and Development Network (SciDevNet),
Conner
AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP (2003). The release of
genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant Journal, 33,
19–46.
Diaz-Bonilla E, Thomas M
(2001). Trade and food security. IFPRI 2020 Focus 8 (Shaping globalization for poverty alleviation and
food security), Brief 4 of 13, August 2001. International Food Policy
Research Institute,
Dommenlen A van (2000). The precautionary
principle: dealing with controversy. Biotechnology Monitor, 43, 8–11, http://www.biotech-monitor.nl/4304.htm
Dutfield G (2001). What impact do IPR rules have on food security? Science and Development
Network (SciDevNet), 25 November 2002,
ECDPM (European Centre for Development
Policy Management) (2003).Evaluating capacity development: advancing the policy
and practice of capacity building in international cooperation. Capacity.org,
Issue 17, April 2003. European Centre for Development Policy Management,
Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops (Экологические эффекты генетически модифицированных культур) http://www.cbio.ru/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2731
European
Commission (2002a). Economic impacts of genetically modified crops on the agri-food sector. Working document, European Commission,
Directorate-General for Agriculture, http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/gmo/ch3.htm
European
Commission (2002b). European network of GMO
laboratories. Stakeholders’ meeting, 4 December 2002,
Brussels. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, http://engl.jrc.it/docs/BookOfAstracts.pdf
European
Commission (2003b). Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on
guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to
ensure the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and
organic farming. Commission of the European Communities,
European
Commission (2004).
Collection of information on enzymes. In: Directive on
dangerous substances (7th amendment), Directive 67/548/EEC. European
Commission,
European
Union (2003a).
Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European parliament and of the Council of
22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling
of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed
products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive
2001/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_268/l_26820031018en00240028.pdf
Falck-Zepeda J, Cohen J, Meinzen-Dick R, Komen J (2002). Biotechnology and
sustainable livelihoods – findings and recommendations of an international
consultation. ISNAR Briefing Paper No 54. International Service for
National Agricultural Research,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (1996).
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (1999a).The importance of food quality and safety for
developing countries. Report of the 25th Session of the Committee on World Food Security, 31
May – 3 June 1999. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (1999b).The state of food insecurity in the world 1999. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2000). Electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture: Summary of
conference 5 (a synopsis of the main arguments and concerns discussed), http://www.fao.org/biotech/logs/c5sum.htm
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2001a).Ethical issues in food and agriculture. FAO Ethics Series, 1. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2001b). Report of the panel of eminent experts on ethics in food and agriculture:
first session, 26–28 September 2000. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2001c). Resolution 3/2001. Adoption of the International
Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and interim
arrangements for its implementation. Commission on Genetic Resources for
Food and Agriculture, FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (2002a). World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. Summary report.
FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (2002b). The state of food and agriculture 2002. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2002c). FAO expert consultation on food safety:
science and ethics. FAO Readings in Ethics, 1. FAO,
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations) (2003).The state of food insecurity in the world (SOFI) 2003. FAO,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (1990). Strategies for
assessing the safety of foods produced by biotechnology, a Joint FAO/WHO consultation, 5–10 November 1990. WHO,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2000). Safety aspects of
genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from
biotechnology,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2001a). Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. Report
of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods
derived from biotechnology, 22–25 January 2001. FAO,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2001b). Safety assessment of foods derived
from genetically modified microorganisms. Report of a joint FAO/WHO
expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2001c). Health and nutritional properties
of probiotics in food including powder milk with live
lactic acid bacteria. Report of a joint FAO/WHO
expert consultation, Cordoba, Argentina, 1–4 October 2001. FAO/WHO,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2003a). Safety assessment of foods derived from genetically
modified animals, including fish, a joint FAO/WHO
expert consultation on food derived from biotechnology,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2003b). Assuring food safety and quality:
guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 76.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations/World Health
Organization,
FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations/World Health Organization) (2004). Emerging risks related to the
environment and new technologies (GF 02/12). Second FAO/WHO Global Forum of Food Safety Regulators,
Feenstra G, Ingels C,
Campbell D (1991).
What is sustainable agriculture? Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education
Program,
Fernandez-Cornejo J,
McBride W (2000). Genetically engineered crops for pest management in US agriculture. Agricultural Economics Report No
AER786. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture,
Washington, DC, May 2000, 29 p, http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/AER786/
FIFRA SAP (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Scientific Advisory Panel) (2004). Minutes of the FIFRA
SAP Advisory Panel meeting held June 8–10, 2004: Product characterization, human
health risk, ecological risk, and insect resistance management for Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) cotton products.
Environmental Protection Agency, FIFRA SAP, http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/2004/june/final1a.pdf
Fletcher GL, Shears MA,
King MJ, Goddard SV (2002).
Transgenic salmon for culture and consumption. In: Driedzic W, McKinley S, MacKinlay
D (eds), International Congress on the Biology of
Fish: Biochemical and physiological advances in finfish aquaculture.
Fredrickson
DS (1979). A history of the recombinant DNA guidelines in the United States.
In: Whelan WJ, Morgan J (eds), Recombinant DNA and genetic experimentation. Pergamon Press, 151–156, http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/FF/B/B/K/C/_/ffbbkc.pdf
Gianessi LP, Silvers CS, Sankula
S, Carpenter JE (2002). Plant biotechnology: current and potential impact for
improving pest management in
Gilfillan
I (2001). Ground
breaking GM bill gets the nod. News Release, Australian Democrats, 30 July
2001, http://sa.democrats.org.au/Media/2001/0730_a.htm
Gregorio G (2002). GM
technology: the answer to poor nutrition? GM Crops Policy
Briefs. Science and Development Network (SciDevNet),
October 2002, http://www.scidev.net/dossiers/index.cfm?fuseaction=policybrief&policy=33&dossier=6
Groth E (2001). The debate over food
biotechnology: is a societal consensus achievable? Paper presented at the
Symposium on Biotechnology Communications: Fortune or Fiasco? Annual Meeting of
the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
Haslberger AG (2001). GMO contamination of seeds.
Nature Biotechnology, 19, 613, http://www.biotechinfo.net/GMO_contamination2.html
Health
Canada (2002) International conference on post-market surveillance of
genetically modified foods. Conference proceedings, 16–17 October 2002.
Health
Helfer LR
(2002). Intellectual property rights in plant varieties: an overview with
options for national governments. FAO Legal Papers
Online No 31, July 2002. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations,
Ho M-W (2002). The best
kept secret of GM crops. Witness Statement to ACRE for ACRE
open hearing on the criticisms of T25 GM maize risk assessment.
IFAD (International Fund Agricultural Development)
(2002). Declining agricultural productivity, the role of biotechnology,
organic and regenerative agriculture. In: Regional assessment of rural
poverty in
James C (2002a). Global
review of commercialized transgenic crops: 2001. Feature: Bt
cotton. ISAAA Brief No 26-2002. International Service
for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications,
James C (2004a). Global area of biotech crops, million hectares (1996 to 2004).
Background document from the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA),
James C (2004b). Global
status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2004. ISAAA
Brief No 32-2004. The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA),
James C (2005). Biotech crop area by country. Background document presented
at EuropaBio, European Association for Bioindustries,
Jenny K (1999). The Indo-Swiss collaboration in biotechnology in search of new
directions. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 39, 10–13, www.biotech-monitor.nl/3904.htm
Juma C (2001). Modern
biotechnology. In: Pinstrup-Andersen P (ed), Appropriate technology for
sustainable food security. IFPRI 2020 Vision Focus 7,
August 2001, http://www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus07/focus07.pdf
Juma C, Konde
V (2002). Technical change and sustainable development: developing country
perspectives. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Annual
Meeting and Science Innovation Exposition, Boston, USA 14–19 February 2002, http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidbiotech/juma_konde_150202.pdf
Krattiger AF (2002). Public–private
partnerships for efficient proprietary biotech management and transfer, and
increased private sector investments: a briefing paper with six proposals
commissioned by UNIDO. IP Strategy Today No 4-2002, http://www.biodevelopments.org/ip/ipst4n.pdf
Louwaars N, Brandenburg W, Gilissen
L, Kleter G, Wagenaar J
(2002). The biosafety
files, a new link in biosafety information. Biotechnology and Development
Monitor, 49, 13–14, http://www.biotechmonitor.nl/4905.htm
Luijben M, Cohen JI
(2000). Developing countries forge ahead in crop biotechnology for the poor.
Next harvest: conference report. International Service for National
Agricultural Research (ISNAR) Biotechnology Service, http://www.isnar.cgiar.org/ibs/nextHarvest.htm
Macilwain C (2005). US launches probe into
sales of unapproved transgenic corn. Nature, 434, 807; online 23 March 2005, http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050321/full/nature03570.html
Marris C, Wynne B, Simmons P, Weldon S
(2001). Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in
Europe. Final report of the PABE research
project funded by the Commission of European Communities, Contract number: FAIR
CT98-3844 (DG12 - SSMI), http://www.lancs.ac.uk/depts/ieppp/pabe/docs/pabe_finalreport.pdf
Messean A, Angevin
F, Colbach N, Meynard J-M
(2003). Forecasting impacts of co-existence within
agricultural systems. Hearing, European Union parliament, http://www.europarl.eu.int/hearings/20030911/agri/messean_en.pdf
Musa TM (1998). Farmer seed systems. Background paper for
the International Workshop on Developing Institutional Agreements and Capacity
to Assist Farmers in Disaster Situations to Restore Agricultural Systems and
Seed Security Activities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO),
National
Research Council (2004). Biological confinement of genetically engineered
organisms. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
NCBE
(National Centre for Biotechnology Education) 2005. Genetically-modified
food: the NCBE guide. National Centre for
Biotechnology Education,
NCBI Genome Resource Guides http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/
Nielsen
CP, Anderson K (2000). GMO’s, trade policy, and welfare in rich and poor countries.
Working Paper No 3/2000. World Bank Workshop on Standards, Regulation and
Trade,
Novis (2003).Economy to benefit from GM-free zones? Online journal Food navigator.com., 22 December 2003, Novis,
Nuffield Council on
Bioethics (1999b).The use of GM crops in developing countries. Nuffield Council
on Bioethics,
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
(1986).
Recombinant DNA safety
considerations. OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/54/1943773.pdf
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1993)
Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology: concepts and
principles.
OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/3/1946129.pdf
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
(1995). Analysis
of information elements used in the assessment of certain products of modern
biotechnology, OCDE/GD(95)11. OECD Environment Monograph 100. OECD,
Paris, http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/1995doc.nsf/LinkTo/ocdegd
(95)11.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
(2005). Biotechnology. OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/topic/0,2686,en_2649_37437_1_1_1_1_37437,00.html
Paarlberg RL
(2002). Governance and food security in an age of
globalization. Food, Agriculture and the Environment
Discussion Paper 36. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI),
Pardey PG, Wright BD, Nottenburg
C (2001a). Are intellectual property rights stifling agricultural biotechnology
in developing countries? International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Annual Report 2000–2001. IFPRI,
PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)
(2001). Harvest
on the horizon: future uses of agricultural biotechnology. PIFB,
PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)
(2002a). Minding
the pharm. Agbiotech Buzz [online
publication], Volume 2, Issue 7, 29 July 2002, http://pewagbiotech.org/buzz/display.php3?StoryID=67
PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)
(2002b).Biotech in the barnyard: implications of genetically engineered
animals. Proceedings from a workshop in Dallas, USA, 2002. PIFB,
PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)
(2003). Future
fish: issues in science and regulation of transgenic fish. PIFB,
PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)
(2004). Bugs in the system? Issues in the science
and regulation of genetically modified insects. PIFB,
PIFB/FDA (Pew Initiative on Food and
Biotechnology/United States Food and Drug Administration) (2003). Animal cloning and the production
of food products: perspectives from the food chain. Proceedings from a workshop
in Dallas, USA, 2003, sponsored by PIFB and the
Center for Veterinary Medicine of the USFDA,
Washington, http://pewagbiotech.org/events/0924/proceedings2.pdf
Pinstrup-Andersen P (2000). The future world food situation and the role of plant diseases.
APSnet,
feature story 1 April through 30 April 2000. American Phytopathological Society,
Pinstrup-Andersen P, Cohen MJ
(2003). Overview of the world food situation and outlook. Food Science
Central. International Food Information Service
Publishing. February 2003. www.foodsciencecentral.com/library.html#ifis/11736
Pinstrup-Andersen P, Pandya-Lorch
R, Rosegrand MW (1999). World food prospects: critical
issues for the early twenty-first century. 2020 Vision, Food Policy Report.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI),
Potrykus I (2000). The ‘golden rice’ tale.
AgBioView, 23 Oct 2000. AgBioWorld,
Tuskegee Institute,
RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International)
(2000). Speed
bump or blow-out for GM seeds? Stalling markets, taco debacle & biotech
bail outs. Speed Bumps or Blow-Up for GM Seed: Stalling Markets, Taco Debacle
& Biotech Bail Outs. Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI) [online publication], 21 December 2000, http://www.etcgroup.org/search2.asp?srch=seed+industry+consolidation
SADC (South African Development Community) (2003)
Launching of the SADC Advisory Committee on
biotechnology biosafety. Media Release, 16 April 2003, http://www.sadc.int/index.php?action=a2001&news_id=80&language_id=1
Shapouri S (2000). Global food security:
overview. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Skerritt JH
(2000). Genetically modified plants: developing countries and
the public acceptance debate. AgBiotechNet,
Volume 2, Feburary, ABN 040, http://binas.unido.org/binas/reviews/Skerritt.pdf
Snow AA, Andow DA, Gepts P, Hallerman EM, Power A, Tiedje JM, Wolfenbarger
LL (2004). Genetically engineered organisms and the
environment: current status and recommendations. Ecological Society of
America,
Stadler MB, Stadler
BM (2003). Allergenicity prediction by protein sequence. The FASEB
Journal, 17, 1141–1143. Published online 22 April 2003, http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/reprint/02-1052fjev1
Talbot B (1983). Development of the National Institutes of Health guidelines for
recombinant DNA research. National Institute of
Tansey G (1999). Trade,
intellectual property, food and biodiversity. Key
issues and options for the 1999 review of Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS
Agreement. Quaker Peace and Service, London.
Taylor
MR, Tick JS (2001). The StarLink case:
issues for the future. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
UNCCD (United Nations Convention to
Combat Desertification) (2005).Official website of the United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification, http://www.unccd.int/
UNCED
(United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992). Earth summit, Rio
de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992. UNCED, http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html
UNDESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs)
(1992). Agenda 21, Division for Sustainable Development. UN
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2003).Human development report 2003. UNDP, http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2003/
UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for
Africa) (2002). Harnessing technology for sustainable development. UNECA Report,
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, http://www.uneca.org/harnessing/.
Unnevehr LJ
(2001). Food safety and food quality. 2020 Focus 8 (Shaping globalization for poverty alleviation and
food security), Brief 7 of 13, August 2001. International Food Policy
Research Institute,
US mulls
approval of GM salmon http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gIw0CaJF37pa_FipsbgRABfXigEA
USAID (United States Agency for International
Development) (1992). USAID policy determination: definition of
food security. USAID,
USDA
(United States Department of Agriculture) (2000). Food security
assessment, GFA-12. International Agriculture and
Trade Reports. Economic Research Service, United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC, December 2000, http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/gfa12/gfa12.pdf
van Meijl H, van
Tongeren F (2002). International diffusion of gains from biotechnology and the European
Union’s Common Agricultural Policy. Agricultural Economics Research Institute,
von Schirnding
YE (2002). Health and environment indicators in the context
of sustainable development. Canadian Journal of Public
Health, 93, Supplement 1, S9–S15.
Wendt J, Izquierdo J (2001). Biotechnology and development: a
balance between IPR protection and benefitsharing. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 4(3), http://ejb.ucv.cl/content/vol4/issue3/issues/01/index.html
WHO
(World Health Organization) (2000c). Turning the tide of
malnutrition: responding to the challenge of the 21st century. WHO,
WHO
(World Health Organization) (2002a). Genomics and world health: report of the
Advisory Committee on Health Research. World Health Organization,
WHO (World Health
Organization) (2002b).WHO global food safety strategy: safer food for better
health. World Health Organization,
WHO/EURO–ANPA (World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe
– Agenzia Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente; Italian
Environmental Protection Agency) 2000. Release of genetically modified organisms in
the environment: is it a health hazard? Report of a Joint
WHO/EURO-ANPA Seminar. World Health
Organization,
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
(2005). Technological and legal development in intellectual property.
In: WIPO, Intellectual property handbook: policy, law
and use. WIPO Publication No 489(E). WIPO,
World Bank (1997) World
Bank progress report (1997). Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP) Working Paper No 28, http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDS_IBank_Servlet?pcont=details&eid=000090341_20040206141342
World
Bank (2000b). Millennium development goals. The World Bank Group, http://ddpext.worldbank.org/ext/MDG/home.do
World
Information Transfer (1996). Special focus: food security for all. World Ecology Report by the World
Information Transfer (WIT), 8(4), Fall 1996, http://www.worldinfo.org/fileadmin/wer/english/1996_Winter_Vol_VIII_No_4.pdf
WTO
(World Trade Organization) (1995).Article 9 of the Agreement of the application
of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. World Trade Organization,
WTO
(World Trade Organization) (2005). Official website of the
Standards and Trade Development Facility. WTO,
WTO/WHO
(World Trade Organization/World Health Organization) (2002). WTO agreements and public health: a
joint study by WHO and the WTO Secretariat. World
Trade Organization/World Health Organization,
© Афонин Алексей Алексеевич
Доктор с.-х. наук, профессор Брянского государственного университета
Зав. лабораторией популяционной цитогенетики НИИ ФиПИ БГУ
главная страница сайта ОБЩАЯ И ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКАЯ БИОЛОГИЯ http://afonin-59-bio.narod.ru
e-mail: afonin.salix@gmail.com
дополнительные web-ресурсы
http://afonin-59-salix.narod.ru
последнее обновление страницы 15.01.2012
